What We're Not Studying in Therapy: Politics, Trust, and the Cost of Silence

In clinical psychology, we talk often about cultural competence—race, religion, class, gender. But one dimension remains almost entirely overlooked: political ideology. The field of mental health leans overwhelmingly left, both in research and in clinical practice. This ideological homogeneity creates blind spots: Are conservative clients being subtly pathologized? Are treatment models implicitly shaped by progressive assumptions? What happens when clients sense that their values—moral, spiritual, or civic—are not understood or respected? Though therapists routinely discuss trust, empathy, and therapeutic alliance, few ask how political differences may interfere with these very foundations of care. Studies on therapist-client ideological mismatch, therapist self-disclosure, and value-based dropout are rare. And in many training environments, questioning the profession’s dominant values can feel not only unpopular—but professionally risky. This silence has clinical consequences. Clients may withhold core aspects of their worldview if they fear judgment or misinterpretation. Therapists may unknowingly impose a values framework that’s misaligned with the client’s, weakening alliance and reducing therapeutic effectiveness. Even well-intentioned models of multicultural competency often sidestep political ideology entirely, as though it were irrelevant to identity. As polarization continues to rise, therapists are increasingly encountering clients who feel alienated from mainstream institutions, including therapy itself. Rather than labeling this as resistance or avoidance, clinicians need tools to understand how political identity functions—developmentally, psychologically, and culturally—for their clients. Without open inquiry, we risk reducing therapy to a space that is safe only for some beliefs. In this piece, we outline the ideological blind spots in mental health research, explore how they may distort evidence-based practice, and ask what gets lost when entire worldviews are treated as irrelevant, or worse, suspect. We also examine why many researchers avoid these questions entirely—and what that means for clinical effectiveness across a politically divided population. To read the full article, join our growing network of therapists, students, and supervisors who are committed to intellectually honest, politically aware, and clinically grounded dialogue. Members of the Remnant Counselor Collective receive full access to longform essays like this one, research reviews, community discussion, and exclusive interviews. Become a member today: https://www.remnantcounselorcollective.com/membership

Serving Conservative Religious Clients: The Competency Gap No One Acknowledges The mental health professions have long emphasized cultural competence as a cornerstone of ethical practice. Yet a significant paradox exists within contemporary clinical training: while practitioners receive extensive preparation for working with marginalized populations, there remains a conspicuous absence of training focused on serving clients from conservative religious traditions (Vieten & Lukoff, 2022). This gap reflects not merely an oversight but a structural blind spot rooted in the ideological composition of the helping professions themselves. The Homogeneity Problem Research consistently demonstrates that mental health professionals lean substantially leftward on the political spectrum compared to the general population (Duarte et al., 2015). Duarte and colleagues documented that social psychologists identify as liberal over conservative at ratios exceeding 14:1, a disparity that has increased dramatically since the 1990s. This ideological concentration extends beyond psychology into counseling, social work, and related fields (Willman et al., 2023). While political orientation alone does not determine clinical competence, it becomes problematic when it correlates with systematic gaps in understanding the worldviews of conservative religious clients. The consequences of this homogeneity manifest in multiple ways. First, clinicians may lack familiarity with the theological frameworks, moral reasoning, and community structures that shape conservative religious clients' identities and decision-making processes (Hathaway et al., 2004). An evangelical Christian seeking counsel regarding marital difficulties operates within a framework where scriptural authority, covenant theology, and church community accountability carry profound weight. A therapist unfamiliar with these concepts may misinterpret the client's values as rigidity or propose interventions fundamentally incompatible with the client's commitments. Second, ideological homogeneity can foster implicit bias regarding religion itself. Research by Rowatt and colleagues (2004, 2010) has documented associations between religious priming and prejudiced attitudes, while studies examining therapist attitudes reveal that many hold negative views toward religious clients, particularly those from conservative traditions (Dein et al., 2010; Neeleman & Lewis, 1994). When the dominant culture within a profession regards certain belief systems with suspicion or condescension, practitioners may fail to recognize their own countertransference or may subtly communicate disrespect that damages the therapeutic alliance. Third, a "religiosity gap" exists between mental health professionals and their clients, with clinicians consistently reporting lower religiosity than the general population they serve (Crosby & Bossley, 2012; Shafranske & Malony, 1990). Willman et al. (2023) found that only 39% of Canadian psychologists believed in a transcendent dimension, compared to substantially higher rates in the general population. This gap creates challenges for empathy and understanding when working with clients for whom faith is central to identity and meaning-making. Understanding Traditional Religious Worldviews Conservative religious traditions share certain structural features despite their theological differences (Pargament, 2007). These include authoritative sacred texts, emphasis on moral absolutes, hierarchical community structures, and skepticism toward moral relativism. Understanding these commonalities while respecting particular theological distinctions represents essential competence. For evangelical Christians, the authority of Scripture shapes approaches to issues ranging from sexuality to parenting to vocational decisions (Lloyd & Richter, 2021). Traditional Catholics navigate life within a sacramental worldview where church teaching and natural law provide moral guidance (Plante, 2023). Orthodox Jews structure daily life around halakha (Jewish law), with rabbinical authority playing a significant role in major decisions (Pirutinsky & Rosmarin, 2022). Conservative Muslims similarly orient themselves according to Quranic teaching and Sharia principles, often consulting religious scholars on matters of conscience (Tanhan et al., 2021). Clinicians need not personally affirm these frameworks, but they must understand them sufficiently to provide contextually appropriate care (Hook et al., 2017). This requires more than superficial knowledge. It demands engagement with how these traditions conceptualize human flourishing, the role of suffering, the nature of virtue, and the purpose of existence. Without this foundation, clinicians risk imposing secular assumptions that clients may experience as deeply alienating (Lloyd & Waller, 2020). The Competency-Values Tension A particularly challenging aspect of serving conservative religious clients involves navigating areas where professional norms may conflict with client values (Kocet & Herlihy, 2014). The American Psychological Association's (2017) Ethics Code requires psychologists to respect client dignity and autonomy while also upholding principles of beneficence and non-discrimination. Yet what constitutes respectful care remains contested when clients hold views on sexuality, gender, family structure, or other domains that diverge from prevailing professional consensus. Consider the example of a devout Muslim woman who experiences distress related to her decision to wear hijab in a Western context (Ahmed & Reddy, 2007). A culturally competent approach would explore the meaning of this practice within her faith tradition, the social pressures she faces, and strategies for managing external judgment while honoring her religious convictions. An incompetent approach would frame hijab-wearing itself as oppression requiring liberation, thereby imposing the clinician's ideological framework onto the client's experience. Similarly, an Orthodox Jewish client struggling with same-sex attraction within a community where traditional sexual ethics remain normative requires a clinician who can hold complexity (Jones & Yarhouse, 2011; Throckmorton & Yarhouse, 2006). This means acknowledging the genuine psychological distress that may accompany feeling torn between religious identity and sexual orientation, while neither dismissing the client's religious commitments as inherently harmful nor pressuring them toward outcomes incongruent with their deeply held beliefs. Research by Yarhouse and colleagues (2008, 2011) demonstrates that therapists can ethically work within clients' religious frameworks while providing competent psychological care, though this requires specialized knowledge and careful clinical judgment. The Evidence for Religious Integration The empirical literature provides robust support for integrating clients' religious and spiritual beliefs into treatment. Captari et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of 97 studies involving 7,181 participants and found that religiously and spiritually adapted psychotherapy resulted in significantly greater improvements in both psychological and spiritual functioning compared to secular treatments. Effect sizes were moderate for psychological outcomes and substantial for spiritual outcomes. Smith et al. (2007) found similar results in their meta-analysis of 31 outcome studies, with spiritually oriented psychotherapies producing effect sizes of d = 0.56 for various psychological problems. Worthington et al. (2011) demonstrated that patients in religious/spiritual psychotherapies showed greater improvement than those in secular psychotherapies on both psychological (d = .26) and spiritual (d = .41) outcomes across 51 samples. Specific randomized controlled trials further support these findings. Propst et al. (1992) conducted a landmark RCT demonstrating that religious cognitive-behavioral therapy produced significantly lower depression scores than nonreligious CBT or waitlist control in religious clients. Koenig et al. (2015a, 2015b) showed that religiously integrated CBT was as effective as conventional CBT for depression in medically ill patients, with higher treatment adherence among highly religious clients and marginally greater therapeutic alliance in the religious condition. The evidence extends across religious traditions. Razali et al. (1998) found that Muslim patients receiving religious-sociocultural psychotherapy responded significantly faster than those receiving standard treatment alone. Wade et al. (2007) demonstrated that Christian clients with high religious commitment reported greater closeness with therapists and greater improvement when receiving religious interventions. De Abreu Costa and Moreira-Almeida (2022) systematically reviewed 10 RCTs of religion-adapted CBT and found consistent superiority to waitlist conditions. These findings challenge the assumption that religion is merely incidental to treatment. For religious clients, faith commitments shape identity, meaning-making, coping strategies, social support networks, and moral reasoning (Pargament, 2007). Ignoring or opposing these commitments not only misses therapeutic opportunities but may actively harm the therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes (Hook et al., 2013; Owen et al., 2014). Institutional Barriers to Competence The scarcity of training in serving conservative religious populations reflects several institutional factors (Fox, 2024; Vogel et al., 2013). First, clinical training programs rarely require coursework specifically addressing conservative religious worldviews, despite mandating training in other cultural domains. Vogel et al. (2013) surveyed 532 respondents from 50 doctoral programs and 60 internship sites and found that among diversity areas, spirituality and religion received the least attention and were rated least effective in developing competence. Fox (2024) found in a national survey of 894 licensed mental health professionals that 47% received either none or minimal religion/spirituality training, with another 35% receiving only some training. This indicates lack of consistency across disciplines. Schafer et al. (2011) documented that while 25% of APA-accredited clinical psychology programs offered spirituality/religion courses, most were electives rather than required coursework, and systematic coverage remained rare. Parker et al. (2023) found that school psychology students received particularly limited preparation in religious and spiritual diversity, with programs most frequently addressing disability, socioeconomic, and racial/ethnic diversity instead. This suggests a hierarchy of diversity concerns in which religion occupies a lower tier. Second, field placement sites serving conservative religious communities remain underrepresented in clinical training networks (Vieten et al., 2024). Students consequently have limited supervised experience working with these populations. Third, continuing education offerings addressing conservative religious populations lag significantly behind those focused on other cultural groups. Finally, professional associations have at times taken public positions on contested social issues in ways that may discourage conservative religious practitioners from engaging openly within professional spaces, further limiting mentorship opportunities (Redding, 2001). These institutional patterns create a self-reinforcing cycle. The absence of conservative religious voices within the professions means that training needs remain unacknowledged, which in turn perpetuates the ideological homogeneity that generated the competency gap initially (Inbar & Lammers, 2012). The Cost of Isolation Too many Christian counselors feel isolated in their professional communities—and isolation leads to burnout. When clinicians lack peers who understand the unique challenges of serving conservative religious populations, they may struggle with professional identity integration, ethical dilemmas without adequate consultation, and a sense of being professionally marginalized for their commitments (Hathaway & Yarhouse, 2021). Remnant Counselor Collective addresses this critical need by creating a community where Christian counselors connect and support one another. This network prevents burnout and helps counselors flourish by providing: Peer consultation on complex cases involving religious values Professional development focused on faith-integrated practice A supportive community that understands the intersection of faith and clinical work Resources for maintaining competence in serving religious clients For Christian counselors seeking to serve their communities with excellence while maintaining professional standards, Remnant Counselor Collective offers the collegial support that training programs often fail to provide. Learn more at https://www.remnantcounselorcollective.com/membership. Moving Toward Genuine Competence Addressing this competency gap requires intentional effort at individual, training, and institutional levels (Vieten & Lukoff, 2022). Individual clinicians can pursue self-directed education through reading primary religious texts, consulting with religious leaders, and seeking supervision from colleagues with expertise in serving conservative religious populations (Pargament, 2007). Humility represents an essential starting point—recognizing that one's own secular or progressive religious framework constitutes a particular worldview rather than a neutral baseline against which other perspectives should be measured (Hook et al., 2017). Training programs should incorporate content addressing conservative religious traditions into required multicultural coursework (Pearce et al., 2024). Pearce and colleagues evaluated the Spiritual Competency Training in Mental Health curriculum integrated into 20 graduate programs and found that just 6 hours of class time significantly increased students' attitudes, knowledge, and skills in spiritual and religious competencies. This demonstrates that meaningful change need not require extensive curricular overhaul. Content should include not only theological knowledge but also practical skills for navigating values tensions, building rapport across ideological differences, and consulting appropriately with religious community resources (Barnett & Johnson, 2011). Field placements should actively include sites serving conservative religious communities, providing students with supervised experience in these contexts. Professional associations can contribute by fostering intellectual diversity within their membership, creating space for respectful dialogue across ideological differences, and developing practice guidelines that genuinely honor both client autonomy and the full range of religious commitments clients bring to treatment (American Psychological Association, 2017). The APA's Multicultural Guidelines explicitly include religion and spirituality as critical multicultural identity dimensions, providing a foundation for more systematic training. Research funding priorities should include investigation of effective approaches for serving conservative religious populations, an area currently understudied relative to its clinical importance (Worthington et al., 2011). Questions about optimal training methods, cultural adaptation of evidence-based treatments, and best practices for values-diverse practice deserve empirical attention. Collaboration with religious communities represents another essential component. Leavey et al. (2021) documented that clergy regularly encounter mental health cases and effectively identify high-risk situations. Weaver et al. (1996) argued for improved collaboration between mental health professionals and clergy in assessment and treatment. Such partnerships can facilitate appropriate referrals, enhance treatment engagement among religious clients, and provide clinicians with cultural consultation (Hankerson et al., 2018). Conclusion The competency gap in serving conservative religious clients represents more than an academic concern. It affects the quality of care available to millions of individuals whose religious commitments shape their identities and inform their understanding of psychological wellbeing. Acknowledging this gap requires the profession to reckon honestly with its own ideological composition and the blind spots this homogeneity creates (Duarte et al., 2015). Cultural competence has always demanded that clinicians stretch beyond their own cultural horizons to understand clients on their own terms (Hook et al., 2017). Extending this same competence to conservative religious populations requires no abandonment of professional ethics or clinical standards. It requires instead a recognition that genuine respect for human diversity includes religious diversity in its full expression, not merely those forms of religiosity that align comfortably with secular progressive sensibilities. The empirical evidence is clear: religiously integrated therapy produces superior outcomes for religious clients (Captari et al., 2018; Smith et al., 2007; Worthington et al., 2011). Training can effectively develop clinician competencies in brief, focused formats (Pearce et al., 2024). Cultural humility toward clients' religious identities predicts stronger therapeutic alliance and better treatment outcomes (Hook et al., 2013; Owen et al., 2014). The path forward exists; what remains is the professional will to walk it. Until the helping professions address this gap forthrightly, they fall short of the multicultural ideals they espouse. Conservative religious clients deserve clinicians who understand their worldviews, respect their commitments, and possess the specialized knowledge to provide culturally competent care. The evidence demands nothing less. AI Disclosure This blog post was developed with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) technology. The author used AI to conduct literature searches, synthesize research findings, generate initial drafts, and refine the structure and content of the article. All cited sources were verified for accuracy, and the final arguments, interpretations, and conclusions reflect the author's professional judgment and expertise. The use of AI served to enhance the efficiency and comprehensiveness of the research and writing process while maintaining academic integrity and adherence to APA 7 citation standards. References Ahmed, S., & Reddy, L. A. (2007). Understanding the mental health needs of American Muslims: Recommendations and considerations for practice. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 35(4), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1912.2007.tb00061.x American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ American Psychological Association. (2017). Multicultural guidelines: An ecological approach to context, identity, and intersectionality. http://www.apa.org/about/policy/multicultural-guidelines.pdf Barnett, J. E., & Johnson, W. B. (2011). Integrating spirituality and religion into psychotherapy: Persistent dilemmas, ethical issues, and a proposed decision-making process. Ethics & Behavior, 21(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2011.551471 Captari, L. E., Hook, J. N., Hoyt, W., Davis, D. E., McElroy-Heltzel, S. E., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2018). Integrating clients' religion and spirituality within psychotherapy: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(11), 1938–1951. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22681 Crosby, J., & Bossley, N. (2012). The religiosity gap: Preferences for seeking help from religious advisors. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 15(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2011.561485 de Abreu Costa, M., & Moreira-Almeida, A. (2022). Religion-adapted cognitive behavioral therapy: A review and description of techniques. Journal of Religion and Health, 61(1), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01345-z Dein, S., Cook, C. C. H., Powell, A., & Eagger, S. (2010). Religion, spirituality and mental health. The Psychiatrist, 34(2), 63–64. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.109.025924 Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14000430 Fox, J. (2024). Religion and spirituality in counselor education: Do we really need to talk about this? Counselor Education and Supervision, 63(3), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12310 Hankerson, S. H., Svob, C., Weissman, M. M., Wickramaratne, P., Chassman, J., Garner, L. D., Lanzillo, E. C., Perez, G., Brown, L., Lewis, D., & Gameroff, M. J. (2018). Partnering with Black churches to increase access to care. Psychiatric Services, 69(4), 395–396. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800019 Hathaway, W. L., Scott, S. Y., & Garver, S. A. (2004). Assessing religious/spiritual functioning: A neglected domain in clinical practice? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.35.1.97 Hathaway, W. L., & Yarhouse, M. A. (2021). The integration of psychology and Christianity: A domain-based approach. IVP Academic. Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Owen, J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Utsey, S. O. (2013). Cultural humility: Measuring openness to culturally diverse clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032595 Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Owen, J., & DeBlaere, C. (2017). Cultural humility: Engaging diverse identities in therapy. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000037-000 Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612448792 Jones, S. L., & Yarhouse, M. A. (2011). A longitudinal study of attempted religiously mediated sexual orientation change. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 37(5), 404–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2011.607052 Kocet, M. M., & Herlihy, B. J. (2014). Addressing value-based conflicts within the counseling relationship: A decision-making model. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92(2), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00146.x Koenig, H. G., Pearce, M. J., Nelson, B., & Daher, N. (2015a). Effects of religious vs. standard cognitive behavioral therapy on therapeutic alliance: A randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy Research, 26(3), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1006156 Koenig, H. G., Pearce, M. J., Nelson, B., Shaw, S. F., Robins, C. J., Daher, N. S., Cohen, H. J., Berk, L. S., Bellinger, D. L., Pargament, K. I., Rosmarin, D. H., Vasegh, S., Kristeller, J., Juthani, N., Nies, D., & King, M. B. (2015b). Religious vs. conventional cognitive behavioral therapy for major depression in persons with chronic medical illness: A pilot randomized trial. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 203(4), 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000273 Leavey, G., Biglerian, N., Rossi, G., & King, M. (2021). Clergy as a frontline mental health service: A UK survey of medical practitioners and clergy. BMJ Open, 10(11), e040219. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040219 Lloyd, C. E. M., & Richter, G. (2021). From whence cometh my help? Psychological distress and help-seeking in the Evangelical Christian Church. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 744432. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744432 Lloyd, C. E. M., & Waller, R. M. (2020). Demon? Disorder? Or none of the above? A survey of the attitudes and experiences of evangelical Christians with mental distress. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 23(8), 679–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2019.1675148 Neeleman, J., & Lewis, G. (1994). Religious identity and comfort beliefs in three groups of psychiatric patients and a group of medical controls. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 40(2), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/002076409404000205 Owen, J., Jordan, T. A., Turner, D., Davis, D. E., Hook, J. N., & Leach, M. M. (2014). Therapists' multicultural orientation: Client perceptions of cultural humility, spiritual/religious commitment, and therapy outcomes. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 42(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/009164711404200111 Pargament, K. I. (2007). Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: Understanding and addressing the sacred. Guilford Press. Parker, J. S., Murray, K., Boegel, R., Slough, M., Purvis, L., & Geiling, C. (2023). An exploratory study of school psychology students' perceptions of religious and spiritual diversity training in their graduate programs. Contemporary School Psychology, 27(2), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00396-z Pearce, M. J., Pargament, K. I., Wong, S., Hinkel, H., Salcone, S., Morgan, G., Kemp, D., Brock, B., Kim, E., Oxhandler, H. K., Vieten, C., Fox, J., Polson, E. C., & Currier, J. M. (2024). Enhancing training in spiritual and religious competencies in mental health graduate education: Evaluation of an integrated curricular approach. PLOS ONE, 19(9), e0306114. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306114 Pirutinsky, S., & Rosmarin, D. H. (2022). A comparative study of mental health diagnoses, symptoms, treatment, and medication use among Orthodox Jews. Transcultural Psychiatry, 59(2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615211068607 Plante, T. G. (2023). What is Catholic psychotherapy and how should it move forward? Integratus, 1(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1521/intg.2023.1.1.7 Propst, L. R., Ostrom, R., Watkins, P., Dean, T., & Mashburn, D. (1992). Comparative efficacy of religious and nonreligious cognitive-behavioral therapy for the treatment of clinical depression in religious individuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.60.1.94 Razali, S. M., Hasanah, C. I., Aminah, K., & Subramaniam, M. (1998). Religious-sociocultural psychotherapy in patients with anxiety and depression. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 32(6), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048679809073877 Redding, R. E. (2001). Sociopolitical diversity in psychology: The case for pluralism. American Psychologist, 56(3), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.205 Rowatt, W. C., & Franklin, L. M. (2004). Christian orthodoxy, religious fundamentalism, and right-wing authoritarianism as predictors of implicit racial prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1402_4 Rowatt, W. C., LaBouff, J. P., Johnson, M., Froese, P., & Tsang, J. (2009). Associations among religiousness, social attitudes, and prejudice in a national sample of American adults. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014989 Schafer, R. M., Handal, P. J., & Brawer, P. A. (2011). Training and education in religion/spirituality within APA-accredited clinical psychology programs: 8 years later. Journal of Religion and Health, 50(2), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-009-9272-8 Shafranske, E. P., & Malony, H. N. (1990). Clinical psychologists' religious and spiritual orientations and their practice of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 27(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088092 Smith, T. B., Bartz, J., & Richards, P. S. (2007). Outcomes of religious and spiritual adaptations to psychotherapy: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy Research, 17(6), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300701250347 Tanhan, A., Young, J. S., Demirbatir-Kahraman, R. E., Francisco, V. T., Çiçek, İ., Arslan, G., & Allen, K.-A. (2021). Muslims and mental health services: A concept map and a theoretical framework. Journal of Religion and Health, 60(6), 4523–4568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01324-4 Throckmorton, W., & Yarhouse, M. A. (2006). Sexual identity therapy: Practice framework for managing sexual identity conflicts. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37(5), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.37.5.523 Vieten, C., & Lukoff, D. (2022). Spiritual and religious competencies in psychology. American Psychologist, 77(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000821 Vieten, C., Scammell, S., Pilato, R., Ammondson, I., Pargament, K. I., Lukoff, D., Lu, F., Miller, L., Schopen-Manders, F., Harris, M., Horneffer, K., Masters, K., Pearce, M. J., Fox, J., Oxhandler, H. K., Wong, S., Polson, E. C., & Currier, J. M. (2024). Spiritual and religious competency training for mental health care professionals: How much is enough? Counselor Education and Supervision, 63(3), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12311 Vogel, M. J., McMinn, M. R., Peterson, M. A., & Gathercoal, K. A. (2013). Examining religion and spirituality as diversity training: A multidimensional study of doctoral training in the American Psychological Association. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 44(3), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032990 Wade, N. G., Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). Effectiveness of religiously tailored interventions in Christian therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 17(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300500497388 Weaver, A. J., Koenig, H. G., & Ochberg, F. M. (1996). Posttraumatic stress, mental health professionals, and the clergy: A need for collaboration, training, and research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(4), 847–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02104106 Willman, T., Douce, T. B., & Bedi, R. (2023). Differences in religious and spiritual practice variables between Canadian counselors and psychologists. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 57(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/00846724221141738 Worthington, E. L., Jr., Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., & McDaniel, M. A. (2011). Religion and spirituality. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(2), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20760 Yarhouse, M. A. (2008). Narrative sexual identity therapy. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 36(3), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180701236498